Fichier Diskussioun:Wëll Lann 001.jpg

Ok for Commons?

{{Elo op Commons|Wëll Lann 001.jpg}}
I moved the file to Commons to see what they think on Commons. Generally we want proof of all permissions but since OTRS was not available from the start exceptions have been made for older files. --MGA73 18:27, 6. Dez. 2011 (UTC)

This file was licensed GFDL since upload. So I think it is ok for Commons. --Les Meloures 18:31, 6. Dez. 2011 (UTC)

Yes but the question is if d'Madame Hammer agreed to GFDL and commercial usage etc.

I think we should try to get as many permissions as possible send to OTRS to secure them for the future. Then there is the question about old permissions. I think that users that is familiar with copyright can be trusted because we can expect them to explain to the copyright holder what it means to give permission for us to upload the files to Wikipedia under a free license.

Here is a link to the discussion on Commons: Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wëll Lann 001.jpg. --MGA73 18:43, 6. Dez. 2011 (UTC)

As far as I know the pictures were taken by Cornischong. I don't know wky he relates to Madame Hammer but I may ask her. I know this person because I'm native from that village. B.r. --Les Meloures 19:03, 6. Dez. 2011 (UTC)

Oh. In that case perhaps you could also ask about Fichier:Wëll Lann P&Ch 016.jpg? --MGA73 20:16, 6. Dez. 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, Les Meloures, for asking Ms Hemmer. I understood it that Cornischong got the pictures from her, as she (or someone she knows) took them in the thunderstorm when the tree collapsed and the days after when the remaining branches were removed... --Zinneke 20:19, 6. Dez. 2011 (UTC)

File was kept - see Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wëll Lann 001.jpg: "Kept as we had no established OTRS procedure for these cases at that time (OTRS was in its very early stages). As long as it is connected with editors in good standing we should proceed with AGF in these old cases.". --MGA73 (Diskussioun) 18:40, 6. Mee 2012 (UTC)