Diskussioun:Youn Czekanowicz

bis ewell keng spilleresch Relevanz, mee fir eis Lieser eng grouss Relevanz,

Ahaaa, an op wat baséiert déi grouss Relevanz fir eis Lieser????????????????

Vläicht well hien 3 Méint an der Minimes-Equipe zu Ettelbréck gespillt huet.????

Et muss ee schonn e Witzbold sinn fir do nach eng grouss Relevanz erauszefannen!!!

Otets, it's doesn't matter how many times people watched the page. I can create page about my cat and will reload it every 20 sec until I reach several thousands of views. He just played for a junior Belgian team and for the junior Polish national team (U16! it's even not U21!). He has been called up for the Luxembourgian team but never played a minute on field. --Wolverène (Diskussioun) 13:09, 2. Dez. 2017 (UTC)

I fully admit that as a player he is not relevant. It just stroke me that his page is among those of the most popular of this wiki. Sure, one might artificially boost the number of views by going every day many times to the own page, but does that really seem likely (the player could not know that I will check the number of views). --Otets ♣ 16:26, 3. Dez. 2017 (UTC)

I just watched the list of most popular lb pages, I don't really understand the hype trends among Luxembourgers. Random selection – #1: ISBN, #2: Lëtzebuerg (Land) ... #10: Gemeng Bartreng, #21: Lëtzebuerg (Stad), #22: Sophie Colquhoun (eehhh...), #31: Youn Czekanowicz, #59: Esch-Uelzecht, #81: New York City, #88: Belsch, #181: Edmond de la Fontaine, #202: Jean-Claude Juncker, #212: Henri vu Lëtzebuerg, #368: Lëtzebuergesch Foussballnationalequipe, #476: Lil Peep, #485: Sokrates, #566: Donald Trump, #691: Olympesch Spiller ... Lady Gaga: 26 views, Marilyn Monroe: 20 views

Should we trust it and is there any logics? Looks weird. --Wolverène (Diskussioun) 18:10, 3. Dez. 2017 (UTC)

This page has been with a very very high chance been pushed up on google.lu and lb.wikipedia.org. This type of "attack" is called SEO (Search Engine Optimisation). There exist "good" (and also accepted) SEO: creating a FB page, Google +, Wikidata entry, ...) and "malicious" SEO. Malicious SEO is "easy" to detect for a human. Let's use this person's wiki page. How was it done? The bot googled his name and searched for the lb.wikiepdia.org link and clicked on it repeatedly. Why am I so sure about it? Well when I google "Youn " (with a space) on google.lu he is the first! proposition in the google autocomplete. Very strange because I do think that "Young Thug" (rapper by the way) should be definitely higher on the list. Another "really strange" thing: Why the hell all of a sudden does this page got 1063 views in only 2 days? PS: Otets I did received your email I'm just busy at the moment. Graph: https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=lb.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-120&pages=Youn_Czekanowicz%7CJean-Claude_Juncker --Soued031

@ Otets:

I fully admit that as a player he is not relevant. Et geet awer eebe just ëm seng Relevanz als Spiller an ëm soss näischt. An dofir gouf den Artikel proposéiert fir ze läschen an e gouf geläscht well en de Critère fir Foussballspiller, iwwer déi héi vun de Leit déi sech haaptsächlech drëm bekëmmeren diskutéiert gouf, net entsprach huet. Mat all deem Gebraddels hei wieren 3 valabel Artikele geschriwwe ginn. Déi rengst Energieverschwendung, well een op gepuscht Zuelen erafëllt, (ouni mol e Vegläich mat anere Sportler ze maachen a sech da mat deem Resultat mol de Kapp ze zerbriechen).

Den Artikel gouf lo an d'Läschlescht agedroen do soll dann lo weider argumentéiert ginn. -- Les Meloures (Diskussioun) 18:49, 3. Dez. 2017 (UTC)